Rodrigo Fernandes vs Maxwell Mckennon Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Mckennon and Fernandes compare in second serve performance recently? Mckennon has won 42.28% of points on their second serve, significantly outperforming Fernandes, who has won only 28%.
• In terms of returning performance, Fernandes excels with 55.93% of opponents' second serve points won, compared to Mckennon's 44.91%.
• In first serve returns, Fernandes leads again with 34.02% points won, while Mckennon trails at 20.69%.
• Mckennon boasts better breakpoint management, saving 48% of breakpoints against them, while Fernandes manages just 28%.
• Who has the superior overall winning record in the past year? Mckennon, with a winning percentage of 61.43%, dominates over Fernandes's 36.36%.
• Mckennon's best surface is Indoor Hard, with a 63% win rate, whereas Fernandes shines best on Hard courts, albeit with a modest 39% win rate.
• Both players primarily participate in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, but Mckennon has a significantly better win rate of 63.93% compared to Fernandes's 36.36%.
• When facing opponents, Mckennon usually competes against less ranked players, with an average opponent rank of 426.09, while Fernandes's average opponent rank is slightly better at 401.82.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Mckennon has a slight edge with a 55% win rate over Fernandes's 50% in such scenarios.
• Considering break point conversion rates, Fernandes is more effective, converting 43.75% of opportunities compared to Mckennon's 33.33%.

Editorial Prediction (June 26, 2025, UTC):

Mckennon demonstrates superior match performance and breakpoint management which are crucial factors in predicting match outcomes.

Although Fernandes shows strength in return games and has a more effective break point conversion rate, Mckennon's overall win percentage and saving capability under pressure give them the edge.

Given these statistics, Mckennon is predicted to be the more likely winner in the upcoming match against Fernandes.